gemma-2-2b-it

24 downloads 0 likes on Hugging Face updated

Papers using or citing this model 26

  • Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code 12.2K citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    We introduce Codex, a GPT language model fine-tuned on publicly available code from GitHub, and study its Python code-writing capabilities. A distinct production version of Codex powers GitHub Copilot. On HumanEval, a new evaluation set...

  • Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems 11.5K citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    State-of-the-art language models can match human performance on many tasks, but they still struggle to robustly perform multi-step mathematical reasoning. To diagnose the failures of current models and support research, we introduce...

  • Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding 10.1K citations · 2020 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    We propose a new test to measure a text model's multitask accuracy. The test covers 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and more. To attain high accuracy on this test, models must possess...

  • Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset 6.9K citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Many intellectual endeavors require mathematical problem solving, but this skill remains beyond the capabilities of computers. To measure this ability in machine learning models, we introduce MATH, a new dataset of 12,500 challenging...

  • HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence? 5.2K citations · 2019 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Recent work by Zellers et al. (2018) introduced a new task of commonsense natural language inference: given an event description such as "A woman sits at a piano," a machine must select the most likely followup: "She sets her fingers on...

  • Program Synthesis with Large Language Models 4.8K citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    This paper explores the limits of the current generation of large language models for program synthesis in general purpose programming languages. We evaluate a collection of such models (with between 244M and 137B parameters) on two new...

  • TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension 4.4K citations · 2017 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    We present TriviaQA, a challenging reading comprehension dataset containing over 650K question-answer-evidence triples. TriviaQA includes 95K question-answer pairs authored by trivia enthusiasts and independently gathered evidence...

  • TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods 4.1K citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    We propose a benchmark to measure whether a language model is truthful in generating answers to questions. The benchmark comprises 817 questions that span 38 categories, including health, law, finance and politics. We crafted questions...

  • PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Language 3.7K citations · 2019 · arXiv

    To apply eyeshadow without a brush, should I use a cotton swab or a toothpick? Questions requiring this kind of physical commonsense pose a challenge to today's natural language understanding systems. While recent pretrained models...

  • Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering 2.9K citations · 2018 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    We present a new kind of question answering dataset, OpenBookQA, modeled after open book exams for assessing human understanding of a subject. The open book that comes with our questions is a set of 1329 elementary level science facts....

  • BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questions 2.8K citations · 2019 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    In this paper we study yes/no questions that are naturally occurring --- meaning that they are generated in unprompted and unconstrained settings. We build a reading comprehension dataset, BoolQ, of such questions, and show that they...

  • CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledge 2.8K citations · 2018 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    When answering a question, people often draw upon their rich world knowledge in addition to the particular context. Recent work has focused primarily on answering questions given some relevant document or context, and required very...

  • Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models 2.7K citations · 2022 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Language models demonstrate both quantitative improvement and new qualitative capabilities with increasing scale. Despite their potentially transformative impact, these new capabilities are as yet poorly characterized. In order to...

  • RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Models 1.9K citations · 2020 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Pretrained neural language models (LMs) are prone to generating racist, sexist, or otherwise toxic language which hinders their safe deployment. We investigate the extent to which pretrained LMs can be prompted to generate toxic...

  • DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs 1.4K citations · 2019 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Reading comprehension has recently seen rapid progress, with systems matching humans on the most popular datasets for the task. However, a large body of work has highlighted the brittleness of these systems, showing that there is much...

  • Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methods 1.2K citations · 2018 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    We introduce a new benchmark, WinoBias, for coreference resolution focused on gender bias. Our corpus contains Winograd-schema style sentences with entities corresponding to people referred by their occupation (e.g. the nurse, the...

  • BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering 952 citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    It is well documented that NLP models learn social biases, but little work has been done on how these biases manifest in model outputs for applied tasks like question answering (QA). We introduce the Bias Benchmark for QA (BBQ), a...

  • AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models 948 citations · 2023 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Evaluating the general abilities of foundation models to tackle human-level tasks is a vital aspect of their development and application in the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Traditional benchmarks, which rely on...

  • Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution 779 citations · 2018 · arXiv

    We present an empirical study of gender bias in coreference resolution systems. We first introduce a novel, Winograd schema-style set of minimal pair sentences that differ only by pronoun gender. With these "Winogender schemas," we...

  • ToxiGen: A Large-Scale Machine-Generated Dataset for Adversarial and Implicit Hate Speech Detection 683 citations · 2022 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Toxic language detection systems often falsely flag text that contains minority group mentions as toxic, as those groups are often the targets of online hate. Such over-reliance on spurious correlations also causes systems to struggle...

  • BOLD: Dataset and Metrics for Measuring Biases in Open-Ended Language Generation 634 citations · 2021 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    Recent advances in deep learning techniques have enabled machines to generate cohesive open-ended text when prompted with a sequence of words as context. While these models now empower many downstream applications from conversation bots...

  • WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at Scale 486 citations · 2019 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    The Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) (Levesque, Davis, and Morgenstern 2011), a benchmark for commonsense reasoning, is a set of 273 expert-crafted pronoun resolution problems originally designed to be unsolvable for statistical models...

  • SocialIQA: Commonsense Reasoning about Social Interactions 482 citations · 2019 · arXiv

    We introduce Social IQa, the first largescale benchmark for commonsense reasoning about social situations. Social IQa contains 38,000 multiple choice questions for probing emotional and social intelligence in a variety of everyday...

  • Evaluating Frontier Models for Dangerous Capabilities 148 citations · 2024 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    To understand the risks posed by a new AI system, we must understand what it can and cannot do. Building on prior work, we introduce a programme of new "dangerous capability" evaluations and pilot them on Gemini 1.0 models. Our...

  • On the Measure of Intelligence 101 citations · 2019 · arXiv (Cornell University) · arXiv

    To make deliberate progress towards more intelligent and more human-like artificial systems, we need to be following an appropriate feedback signal: we need to be able to define and evaluate intelligence in a way that enables...

  • 10.34740/kaggle/m/3301 55 citations · DOI