Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?

@article{guldenring2020,
  title = {Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?},
  author = {Daniel Guldenring and Ali Rababah and Dewar D. Finlay and Raymond R. Bond and Alan Kennedy and Michael Jennings and Khaled Rjoob and James McLaughlin},
  journal = {CinC},
  year = {2020},
  month = {Jan},
  doi = {10.22489/cinc.2020.330},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2020.330},
}

Daniel Guldenring et al. (2020). Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?. CinC. https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2020.330

Daniel Guldenring, et al.. "Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?." CinC, 2020, https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2020.330.

Daniel Guldenring, et al.. "Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?." CinC (2020). https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2020.330

Daniel Guldenring et al., 2020. Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?. CinC. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2020.330>.

TY  - JOUR
TI  - Regression or Pseudo-Inverse - Which Method Should be Preferred When Developing Inverse Linear ECG-Lead Transformations?
AU  - Daniel Guldenring
AU  - Ali Rababah
AU  - Dewar D. Finlay
AU  - Raymond R. Bond
AU  - Alan Kennedy
AU  - Michael Jennings
AU  - Khaled Rjoob
AU  - James McLaughlin
PY  - 2020
JO  - CinC
DO  - 10.22489/cinc.2020.330
UR  - https://doi.org/10.22489/cinc.2020.330
ER  -